Acdsee pro 10 vs 9 full#
Acdsee pro 10 vs 9 software#
Acdsee pro 10 vs 9 download#

Acdsee pro 10 vs 9 software#

Profiles aren’t applied to RAW files by default, and the software seemed unable to read metadata correctly in order to pick out the correct profile automatically. Lens profiles are now included in ACDSee 9, but while the database of lenses looks pretty thorough, there are still a lot of gaps. These lenses exhibit heavy distortion so it’s down to software - either in camera or in RAW-processing software - to correct it. This is offered by Lightroom, and while useful for SLR lenses is absolutely essential for an increasing number of CSC and premium compacts. This has now been largely addressed, and the software recognised RAW files from all the cameras we’ve reviewed in the last 12 months.Īnother long-standing issue is the lack of lens profiles for automatic correction of lens distortions. I’ve previously criticised gaps in RAW file support, with Fujfilm cameras and a few others being notable omissions. The software is able to work with these RAW files - it’s just that the library filter doesn’t seem to know it. For example, it can filter to show all the photos in Canon, Nikon or Olympus RAW format, but not Panasonic RAW. ^ The Dehaze filter can struggle because it doesn’t have direct access to the RAW image dataĪCDSee can filter the photo library by a wide range of criteria based on photos’ metadata, but while some options, such as lens model, give a list of specific lenses that appear in the library, others are unhelpfully predefined. The result was a tendency towards colour banding, noise and odd colours. One of the main reasons to shoot in RAW format is the ability to bring out subtle details, but because ACDSee’s Dehaze filter appears in its Edit mode, it can't access the RAW data. A feature with the same name in Lightroom 6 does a great job, but ACDSee’s implementation tended to make less hazy areas of the frame too dark. Taking an image with layers from Edit to Develop mode isn’t allowed at all.ĭehaze is new in version 9, and offers to bring out details in hazy, low-contrast areas of the frame. Adjustments made to RAW files in Develop mode must be saved as an 8-bit file before they can be brought into Edit mode. I like the idea of RAW processing and layer-based destructive editing in a single application, but Develop and Edit modes feel too much like two discrete applications.

ACDSee’s layer-based editing functions lack the sophistication and finesse of Photoshop, and the controls were often slow to respond. Sadly, the reality didn't live up to expectations. Lightroom users must fire up Photoshop when they want to manipulate images on multiple layers.

Acdsee pro 10 vs 9 full#

This runs the risk of adding to the confusion of which parts of the software are destructive and non-destructive, but the prospect of full layer-based editing alongside RAW processing is appealing. It now supports layers, masks to hide pixels without deleting them, and adjustment layers for applying filters non-destructively. In version 9, Edit mode receives a big boost in power. Destructive editing means it’s not possible to go back and tweak or undo settings at a later date, but it usually comes with a broader range of editing tools. Where ACDSee differs is in its Edit module, where photos are edited destructively, changing the pixel data rather than saving a list of editing decisions. Adobe Lightroom offers the same features and handles them brilliantly, so any rival has its work cut out to compete.

Acdsee pro 10 vs 9 download#

ACDSee 8.1 Download Now Released: Size: 24.ACDSee’s photo management and processing suite incorporates non-destructive RAW editing, map plotting and online sharing.